Jump to content

Nina & Alan and Serena - Part #4


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, squish said:

Do you have an archive reference please bear?

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam18/nina-joe-sexy-shower-oct-20

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam18/edda-alan-sexy-shower-oct-20

only to prove that on this day there was no friction between them four.

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam14/bedtime-69-fuck-suck-oct-20

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam17/edda-joe-late-suck-fuck-oct-20

Excuse me ! But when you are loyal to these 2 projects since its inception and have a "weak" memory as mine is "difficult" you remember these details ..hehehehe😎
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 450
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, ur10intung69 said:

Go to Archives. look for Shower, Edda & Alan.

 

2 hours ago, ur10intung69 said:

WTF? Alan is a bonafide, immature jerk. Only thing he has going for him, IMO, is a big dick. 

hehehehe, good luck in the search with these tips.

I can still say that based on what I observe closely in relation to months of accompaniment, is that much is no longer "immature".

On the contrary, I see him today as one of the male representatives of this site with the most true and loyal behavior to his real and strong feelings for Nina.

This is not to mention the effective charisma that he has with the women of these projects.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thedbear said:

 

hehehehe, good luck in the search with these tips.

I can still say that based on what I observe closely in relation to months of accompaniment, is that much is no longer "immature".

On the contrary, I see him today as one of the male representatives of this site with the most true and loyal behavior to his real and strong feelings for Nina.

This is not to mention the effective charisma that he has with the women of these projects.
 

Here we go. Do you what IMO means? In My Opinion, got it? What that means is, that is my opinion, nothing more. Let's not get into it. Fair enuf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thedbear said:

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam18/nina-joe-sexy-shower-oct-20

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam18/edda-alan-sexy-shower-oct-20

only to prove that on this day there was no friction between them four.

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam14/bedtime-69-fuck-suck-oct-20

https://voyeur-house.tv/moments/realm17/cam17/edda-joe-late-suck-fuck-oct-20

Excuse me ! But when you are loyal to these 2 projects since its inception and have a "weak" memory as mine is "difficult" you remember these details ..hehehehe😎
 

Amazing footage bear. Thanks for taking the trouble. We need to complete the project. Such a shame we can't make a 'request.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ur10intung69 said:

Here we go. Do you what IMO means? In My Opinion, got it? What that means is, that is my opinion, nothing more. Let's not get into it. Fair enuf?

You've been around this site and these forums for more than two years.
I remember discussing things with you then and you didn't seem to get
it much then and, IMO, you still don't seem to get it much.

If I had to guess, I'd say you've probably not read the rules. If you had,
you'd know that if you post an opinion on this site, anyone from the
community is free to disagree with that opinion and post their own.

Those are the rules of the game, but you don't need to take my word on 
that. You can read it for yourself right here:

The Rules of the Game

Specifically, rule number five.

And, that's all Bear did. He didn't agree with what you said and he
posted a differing opinion from yours. He didn't attack you or call you
out or call you names or flamebait you or try to, get into it, as you said.
He simply had an opinion that differed from yours and he posted it, 
which is his right.

Also, IMO, the only person who tried to get into anything was you, when
you said to Bear, in so many words, that he shouldn't post an opinion
that was different than yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, squish said:

Amazing footage bear. Thanks for taking the trouble. We need to complete the project. Such a shame we can't make a 'request.'

Thank you!
And do not worry about "request." As in Anna's projects
  also our comments are not ignored here.
Nina, Serena and Edda herself have already given proof and demonstration on their own cam.
This is therefore the care I have with what I point out here.

And for reinforcement, this was the first (and only) time we saw Edda in closer contact with another man other than Joe. Same for Nina (first time).

For Alan, Edda was the second after Serena.
So yes, we have a loose end there that I still have hopes that might be tied up later. One day,

Just trying to still remember; We have the birthdays of Serena, Alan, Nina and Edda (in this order). I do not remember having Joe's. Has it passed or was it near?

Golfer, Jabbath? Any memory?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, letsdothis said:

You've been around this site and these forums for more than two years.
I remember discussing things with you then and you didn't seem to get
it much then and, IMO, you still don't seem to get it much.

If I had to guess, I'd say you've probably not read the rules. If you had,
you'd know that if you post an opinion on this site, anyone from the
community is free to disagree with that opinion and post their own.

Those are the rules of the game, but you don't need to take my word on 
that. You can read it for yourself right here:

The Rules of the Game

Specifically, rule number five.

And, that's all Bear did. He didn't agree with what you said and he
posted a differing opinion from yours. He didn't attack you or call you
out or call you names or flamebait you or try to, get into it, as you said.
He simply had an opinion that differed from yours and he posted it, 
which is his right.

Also, IMO, the only person who tried to get into anything was you, when
you said to Bear, in so many words, that he shouldn't post an opinion
that was different than yours.

Sorry, pal. I am not trying to be disrespectful or trying to start something. I have my opinions, he has his.  Neither of us attacked anyone. It's a free world. If you wanna take this "out of context", thats your right. Read my post again. It says, "Let's NOT get into it", to keep from argument. In your last paragraph, you are wrong again. Bear has the right to his opinion, same as me. I would never deny anyone their opinion. 

This was a convo between me and Bear. YOU, SIR, ARE BUTTING IN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...