Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said:

Pretty sure when majority of subscribers won't like the archives VH would have already gotten rid of them 😉

That's not the issue. The issue what you're missing. You'll never know. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Sparkles said:

Maybe considering the pro&cons  they decided to join, but doesn't mean they (her) are comfortable with all the features

Ex. I may like my job but working 1H distant from home could be a con that i would prefere not to have 

Exactly, she is at the threshold of people willing to do this. I'm left wondering who we didn't see and what sort of behavior we don't see because of the archives and cc posts. The number is not zero!

Posted
Just now, Amy3 said:

Exactly, she is at the threshold of people willing to do this. I'm left wondering who we didn't see and what sort of behavior we don't see because of the archives and cc posts. The number is not zero!

We can always wonder a lot of other things.. who we didn't see because timeline.. who we didn't see because cams in bathroom (example).. who we didn't see because low payment (considering what they could expect from the job).. who we didn't see because the site is online 24H/7 ... who we didn't see because managers contracts rules

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sparkles said:

We can always wonder a lot of other things.. who we didn't see because timeline.. who we didn't see because cams in bathroom (example).. who we didn't see because low payment (considering what they could expect from the job).. who we didn't see because the site is online 24H/7 ... who we didn't see because managers contracts rules

Exactly and we will never know so why worry?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

Exactly and we will never know so why worry?

Oh I'm not worried. I'm perfectly satisfied to know that I'm right. 🙂

Posted
23 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

Exactly, she is at the threshold of people willing to do this. I'm left wondering who we didn't see and what sort of behavior we don't see because of the archives and cc posts. The number is not zero!

I, for one, would never have joined VHTV without the archives or the timeline. CC was an added bonus that I discovered a month after I joined VH and today this keeps me more engaged than the archive and the timeline.

Take away the timeline, archives and CC and there isn't really much left for me on VH - I bet I'm not alone in this regard.

  • Like 4
Posted
Just now, WatcherCC said:

I, for one, would never have joined VHTV without the archives or the timeline. CC was an added bonus that I discovered a month after I joined VH and today this keeps me at more engaged than the archive and the timeline.

Take away the timeline, archives and CC and there isn't really much left for me on VH - I bet I'm not alone in this regard.

Without CC i wouldn't even had met VH 😁

  • Like 1
Posted

That's all good, but the issue isn't about whether or not the archives or CC create new subs. For sure, it does work that way too, the more subs, the more tenants on VHTV, so yes the content is dependent on the number of subs and the archives do draw more subs. Fine, I'll grant you that, but you have to grant me the fact the presence of the archives and CC does hinder what people are willing to do on cam and also hinders actual people from joining because of their unwillingness to have their sex life stored on VHTV forever. Can you at least grant me that much? 

Posted
1 minute ago, Amy3 said:

That's all good, but the issue isn't about whether or not the archives or CC create new subs. For sure, it does work that way too, the more subs, the more tenants on VHTV, so yes the content is dependent on the number of subs and the archives do draw more subs. Fine, I'll grant you that, but you have to grant me the fact the presence of the archives and CC does hinder what people are willing to do on cam and also hinders actual people from joining because of their unwillingness to have their sex life stored on VHTV forever. Can you at least grant me that much? 

Well, for that we all know what is the answer.. Only VH and managers can grant if that happens or not when they interview possible tenants. 
But having features that brings more subscribers ... that means more money ... that means better payments .. that means higher possibilities of having tenants 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Sparkles said:

Well, for that we all know what is the answer.. Only VH and managers can grant if that happens or not when they interview possible tenants. 
But having features that brings more subscribers ... that means more money ... that means better payments .. that means higher possibilities of having tenants 

If that's all i can get, I'll take it. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, jjkopite said:

Also if people are nervous of the archives then they would probably/possibly be nervous of pictures as well so do we not cap either?

Yes, true! But not entirely true. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...