Anica & Joel (2019) Part #1

[jabbath1987]

Just now, squish said:

This apartment has seen some changes. Ana, Zac, Anica. Like Alan's apartment, the apartment itself has become slightly iconic. I hope we have not lost it entirely.

Hope so too. But I have no idea who to move in there. Maybe Dean can make a comeback?

[miscvoyeur]

4 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

Hope so too. But I have no idea who to move in there. Maybe Dean can make a comeback?

Honestly, that entire group has had its day and should stay away. Dean couldn't keep erections so no need for him to come back and there's no fucking way Candy ever needs to come back. And nobody else in that group would offer anything of excitement.

[Sparkles]

8 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

Hope so too. But I have no idea who to move in there. Maybe Dean can make a comeback?

Yep, Misty is now "alone" in the big city! 

Nyusha or Bree (if still with drew) will also be interesting moves

[squish]

11 minutes ago, Sparkles said:

Yep, Misty is now "alone" in the big city! 

Nyusha or Bree (if still with drew) will also be interesting moves

agreed although I would settle for Corn. Now that (I think) Louise has finished at university, maybe George could offer her an apartment. I am convinced that the way ahead is with younger couples (like Misty). To survive on VH you have to keep at it like rabbits, remember Lola and Otto? I think the older couples just get burnt out or stale. I don't see any signs of flagging from the boys and girls at Sofi's other than Kiril himself.

[jabbath1987]

2 minutes ago, squish said:

agreed although I would settle for Corn. Now that (I think) Louise has finished at university, maybe George could offer her an apartment. I am convinced that the way ahead is with younger couples (like Misty). To survive on VH you have to keep at it like rabbits, remember Lola and Otto? I think the older couples just get burnt out or stale. I don't see any signs of flagging from the boys and girls at Sofi's other than Kiril himself.

Corn is fortunately not in that city...

[Sparkles]

44 minutes ago, squish said:

agreed although I would settle for Corn. Now that (I think) Louise has finished at university, maybe George could offer her an apartment. I am convinced that the way ahead is with younger couples (like Misty). To survive on VH you have to keep at it like rabbits, remember Lola and Otto? I think the older couples just get burnt out or stale. I don't see any signs of flagging from the boys and girls at Sofi's other than Kiril himself.

Not only Corn (like Jab said) but none of all the others are also there. 
It depends what it means surviving at VH.. I don't think they need to keep it like rabbits because pretty quickly will fall down 

Forgot about Em&Bob 

[tofilou]

and the reason is??

[Guest]

38 minutes ago, tofilou said:

and the reason is??

28

[zoifan]

8 hours ago, Just In said:

Who's that Joker on the left.🤣

 

On 10/5/2019 at 4:02 PM, squish said:

agreed although I would settle for Corn. Now that (I think) Louise has finished at university, maybe George could offer her an apartment. I am convinced that the way ahead is with younger couples (like Misty). To survive on VH you have to keep at it like rabbits, remember Lola and Otto? I think the older couples just get burnt out or stale. I don't see any signs of flagging from the boys and girls at Sofi's other than Kiril himself.

 

On 10/5/2019 at 4:05 PM, jabbath1987 said:

Corn is fortunately not in that city...

 

On 10/5/2019 at 4:49 PM, Sparkles said:

Not only Corn (like Jab said) but none of all the others are also there. 
It depends what it means surviving at VH.. I don't think they need to keep it like rabbits because pretty quickly will fall down 

Forgot about Em&Bob 

The problem is that they could not make an average living by VH income. 

If VH provides better pay, they would fight with nail and tooth to join/stay on the project and perform better.

 

The question for all of us is: Are we okay with an increase of subscription cost with a guarantee that the extra money goes to the actual participant pocket, not managers?

 

[Robwin]

8 hours ago, zoifan said:

The problem is that they could not make an average living by VH income. 

If VH provides better pay, they would fight with nail and tooth to join/stay on the project and perform better.

The question for all of us is: Are we okay with an increase of subscription cost with a guarantee that the extra money goes to the actual participant pocket, not managers?

The 3 reasons you state is what has destroyed the principle of Voyeaurism.

Managers, pay & perform. Because that is all it is now, a porn performance for money which is being drained by managers. Eliminate managers and you would have an immediate increase in pay for the tennants which would perhaps encourage better performance as you put it.

However humans are not machines so to expect 24/7 sex is just unrealistic which is what so many subscribers seem to be wanting now.

An increase in subscriptions would perhaps sound the death knell for the whole project as so many are not prepared to pay what they charge now let alone increasing them.

[Dave 27]

1 hour ago, Robwin said:

The 3 reasons you state is what has destroyed the principle of Voyeaurism.

Managers, pay & perform. Because that is all it is now, a porn performance for money which is being drained by managers. Eliminate managers and you would have an immediate increase in pay for the tennants which would perhaps encourage better performance as you put it.

However humans are not machines so to expect 24/7 sex is just unrealistic which is what so many subscribers seem to be wanting now.

An increase in subscriptions would perhaps sound the death knell for the whole project as so many are not prepared to pay what they charge now let alone increasing them.

Spellchecker gone on strike again pal.😀

[Robwin]

1 hour ago, Dave 27 said:

Spellchecker gone on strike again pal.😀

That record is getting a bit boring now pal