Robwin Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said: I have no clue at all. I know a lot about streaming and networks as that is my work I do too (More network ans servers than streaming but also started to program streaming lately too) and the problems they have are clearly linked to their central infrastructure. The hoster they are using is clearly not good. The network code and the programming of the streaming is really good. Seems to have all fallen apart since that last major upgrade they supposed to have had. Weird really.
jabbath1987 Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 Just now, Robwin said: Seems to have all fallen apart since that last major upgrade they supposed to have had. Weird really. I guess the promises of the new hoster were not true. They should try AWS or Google. They are reliable. 1
Robwin Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 17 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said: Completely fucked up again now 🙄 Eh Jabs you're getting as bad as me now with your language 🙄 1
jabbath1987 Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Robwin said: Eh Jabs you're getting as bad as me now with your language 🙄 I could also say FUBAR 😁
Robwin Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said: I could also say FUBAR 😁 Lol haha, no it's ok,fucked up is just fine 😂
ze81 Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 Not working properly again.Stream stops again and again.VHTV please forget opening new sites..FIRST focused in making this one work good. 1
waldi Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 It happened to me that I had a subscription to RLC couple of times in the past and apart of poor content, I have to say streaming was always superb comparing to what @Voyeur House TV offers at the moment; time to take action @Voyeur House TV !! 2
rtgonzo Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 1 hour ago, jabbath1987 said: I guess the promises of the new hoster were not true. They should try AWS or Google. They are reliable. I doubt Goog, AWS, CloudFront. Bluecloud, Azure etc would have them. Due to the nature of the content.... Mid-range moderately sketchy porn hoster + CDN like CloudFlare/Akamai is probably the best the can do. Assuming the are willing/able to pay for the CDN.
jabbath1987 Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 1 minute ago, rtgonzo said: I doubt Goog, AWS, CloudFront. Bluecloud, Azure etc would have them. Due to the nature of the content.... Mid-range moderately sketchy porn hoster + CDN like CloudFlare/Akamai is probably the best the can do. Assuming the are willing/able to pay for the CDN. These are cloud hosters. They only provide the infrastructure. Due to the nature of a cloud you can't see what is run inside it. So that won't be a problem.
rtgonzo Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 2 hours ago, jabbath1987 said: Well there are chunks (segments) of the video missing. They are lost forever as they got never streamed due to the lags. So the player gets irritated and does stop playing or not even start. And if the issue is also on the inbound side, with packets dropped from the apts to vhtv distro servers? Yep, we be boned, those are lost forever.
.thumb.gif.e335e3b234713d678b8911e6eec69d7b.gif)
Recommended Posts