Jump to content

Voyeur-House.TV (2020) Part #1


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jabbath1987 said:

I guess the promises of the new hoster were not true. They should try AWS or Google. They are reliable.

I doubt Goog,  AWS, CloudFront. Bluecloud, Azure etc would have them. Due to the nature of the content.... Mid-range moderately sketchy porn hoster + CDN like CloudFlare/Akamai is probably the best the can do. Assuming the are willing/able to pay for the CDN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rtgonzo said:

I doubt Goog,  AWS, CloudFront. Bluecloud, Azure etc would have them. Due to the nature of the content.... Mid-range moderately sketchy porn hoster + CDN like CloudFlare/Akamai is probably the best the can do. Assuming the are willing/able to pay for the CDN.

These are cloud hosters. They only provide the infrastructure. Due to the nature of a cloud you can't see what is run inside it. So that won't be a problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jabbath1987 said:

Well there are chunks (segments) of the video missing. They are lost forever as they got never streamed due to the lags. So the player gets irritated and does stop playing or not even start.

And if the issue is also on the inbound side, with packets dropped from the apts to vhtv distro servers?  Yep, we be boned, those are lost forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rtgonzo said:

And if the issue is also on the inbound side, with packets dropped from the apts to vhtv distro servers?  Yep, we be boned, those are lost forever.

That is highly unlikely as the problems are always global and I doubt all places at once have problems with bandwidth. The chunks are lost from the distro servers to the users. 

As I doubt there is any long time storage of stream on distro servers these chunks are lost forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...