Jump to content

chrd12345

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    85 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by chrd12345

  1. No, they are just friends respectively businnes partners (as far as i know)
  2. also, i don't think that the drop in activity has to do with the archives and/or guests only. In the past there used to be interesting stuff where only tenants were involved. Even that has dropped significantly.
  3. i am not talking about the tenants. They know exactly what they sign for. That's different for guests, though. They do not have a contract and i could imagine, that VHTV is definition not even allowed to record a guest if the guest doesn't want it!? i totally understand your point and you are probably right with your concern. It was just an idea i had....
  4. To me, the archiv is important and i don't know if i would renew if it was gone. From time to time i can't watch live for a couple of days and so i am happy, that there is a chance to see/check at least something of what i missed. But, for me the videos do not need to stay there forever. I barely watch something older than a couple of weeks or even longer. One month or so would be long enough for me. Another idea would be to restrict access to the archive only to those videos that are recorded during the time of your subscription. That would not give you access to everything for just a month subscription.
  5. please save: https://voyeur-house.tv/realm61/cam13?timestamp=1627005009
  6. I can understand when people are disappointed about what they get in this appartment, but i still don't understand why anyone should think, they (or any other appartment) should leave. My personal opinion is, that as long as anyone can afford being online and wants to be online, there is no reason why they should leave. As they are still online they seem to have more fans than some of you may imagine. If this changes they will be offline sooner or later. That's how VH works in my understanding. This appartment is probably more real life than some of you can imagine. To me, that's perfectly ok. I don't need to watch something i don't like. Also, i can totally understand, why @Daleys opened the other thread. It's just not fun to post to a thread where people are only complaining again and again and again. If you don't like it, just go on and save your words for appartments you like. It really is that easy😉 Btw, this is exactly why i don't post very often on CC. I really don't know why anyone repeats the same critic again and again. Once is enough and ok. If you don't like an appartment just watch something else. And if you don't like any of them, cancel your membership. The often used justification for critics "I pay for that" is just a bad excuse if you ask me. You do pay to see what happens in the appartment and not for anything you expect to happen. Believe it or not, but that's a fact. VH does not promise to deliver any content, as far as i am aware (if they do, let me know). When you subscribe, all you get is to view through the cams. As for Barbie and Ken, i actually prefer watching them than those strange 7+ appartments....
  7. Not really unexpected. I wonder, when Beverley is added again 🙂
  8. belive it or not, but probably not everyone is/was like that in his twenties 🙂
  9. Maybe it's just me. But i wonder about what she was trying to say. Is ist like "please understand and go fucking or sleep on the coach" or something different? Also, what the hell is the "Association of Straights"? 🙂 🙂
  10. not really, but it's at least worth trying 🙂
  11. i really wonder what's going on in this apartment. Lola doesn't look happy at all, Bev is there very often and it looks more like Hugo and Bev are still/again a couple. How does Lola fit in and why did she move in there? Maybe @HugoBeverley can help us a bit? More questions than answers to me 🙂
  12. The tenants are actually real people with basically real lives, so you can never be sure how things evolve over time. Especeially not as the situation they live in (under cams) and a certain pressure to "perform" (to make income) does not make it easier. Also, it is a business, so decisions are of course based a lot of potential income.
  13. Well said! They have actually been more active since they moved to the new flat. x 2. to me a great part of the fun is watching if(!) something happens and how people interact with each other.
  14. Also, even if they know what will be expected from them there is no need to criticise them over and over again. Just watch something else and the "problem" will be solved sooner or later. Let them do whatever they want to, it's their life. If they fail with that it is just the way it is. No one is forced to watch or follow an apt. And finally, if you do not like anything at all that VH offers, just don't renew. Also, people on this forum are not the ones that decide who is allowed to join. That's someting between VH, the manager and the tenants. VH probably doesn't care too much as the risk seems to be mostly on the managers and the tenants. If you ask me i don't care if there are 1000+ Apts as long as there are a couple i like and feel paying for them is ok. They probably had many views this morning. Most likely also from many who want to have this apt closed as soon as possible. If you really want to get rid of an apt, just don't watch it otherwise you are doing the exactly wrong thing. Some or most of you probably won't understand, but i can well imagine, that there are people out there who enjoy watching something like that. Maybe just because it is in some ways more natural than many of the other apts. To me this is kind of refreshing amongst all those apts that just offer the same plain boring sex over and over again.
  15. why isn't there the same discussion in the topic of Marla & Hector? And why should only be wannabe porn stars allowed to join? This whole discussion doesn't make any sense to me.
  16. It would be great if anyone who understands what she says when she's talking to us/herself could give a short summary 🙂
  17. As i said before, i can totally understand why they stop the live stream once they are forced to check something potentially serious out. But, after that there are only two options. If something serious happened, close the apt. If not, put everything back on the timeline.
  18. me too. I used to read long before i posted to find some additional information to what you can see through the cams
  19. If there is violence i would shut down the apt immediately once and for all. Drugs are another and maybe even more complicated issue. There is a thin line between what is acceptable and what not if it comes to drugs for me. But after all i would understand if they ban people that use drugs or they find out to do so. I do not want to see any violent people or any serious drug abusers. It's as simple as that. Unfortunately if you do not understand the language you miss a lot and you have to rely on what you see (which is often very complicated and leads to wrong assumptions).
  20. if there is violence they should close the apt once and for all. That is totally inacceptable. The same is probably best for drug abuse. I would also go as far as to close an apt when managers demand things from tenants they do not want to. Arguments are normal and happen between every couple and even between best friends. That's the way life is and no reason to shut down an apt. I can totally understand, that they shut down an app while investigating what happened. If i were responsible, i would probably do the same. If you ask me, one of the reason why things are what they are now in VHTV is that the viewers have wrong and/or exaggerated expectations of how the tenants should be leading to the fact that tenants fell forced to fulfill those exepections to be able to stay on the site. I (for myself) want to see people who like what they do and not people that are forced (no matter by whom) to do things they would normally not do. Forcing to people to do something is no good idea and only leads to problems.....
  21. there is not much more effctive than taking the stairs. You are probably not forced to use the elevator (but, i would probably use it too....) 🙂
  22. yes, true. Maybe i just used did not the best words to describe this kind of conversation.
  23. when reading all the off-topic here, there is one thing that comes to my mind. Why is there so little moderation here? Aren't moderators the ones who should pay attention to people not getting insulted? It seems as if you can write almost anything here without any consequences. I think, nobody should be insulted, no matter if they are guest, members, paying members, tenants or whatever. The same rules should be applied to everyone. If a tenant gets insulted you are not insulting the character they play (as you would do if you insult a character in a TV film), you are insulting the person directly. They are not actors in the strict sense, many of them just try to do something to entertain us. That's a major difference in my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...