Jump to content

Sina & Jules (2020) Part #3


ashteaduk1

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jawis said:

Second visit. Further than this Jules didn't came but damned she's gorgeous and what a temper. The way she walked in the house.🤣 Have doubts but if Jules would get this one in the bed he would be in for a treat i think. 

52002

If he manages that he deserves a bloody medal i think :biggrin:

giphy.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, Robwin said:

If he manages that he deserves a bloody medal i think :biggrin:

giphy.gif

Never heard of an escort have you? In this case, an investment in future earnings. Jules pays the girls pimp, the viewers pays VHTV, VHTV pays George, George pays Jules, the pimp gives girl dope.....and I think to myself, it's a wonderful world. Not really, it's rotten to the core. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lipstick said:

 

Never heard of an escort have you? In this case, an investment in future earnings. Jules pays the girls pimp, the viewers pays VHTV, VHTV pays George, George pays Jules, the pimp gives girl dope.....and I think to myself, it's a wonderful world. Not really, it's rotten to the core. 

Wouldn't surpirse me either. The way Keidn was playing with the camera this morning. But then again. The girls are hot so what the hell. At least something happens here now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lipstick said:

 

Never heard of an escort have you? In this case, an investment in future earnings. Jules pays the girls pimp, the viewers pays VHTV, VHTV pays George, George pays Jules, the pimp gives girl dope.....and I think to myself, it's a wonderful world. Not really, it's rotten to the core. 

Basically if I follow your reasoning, it's a profitable situation for everyone
Voyeurs have what they expect from their investment, the same goes for VHTV, Jules and everyone involved.

What is good about this system is that the voyeur is free of his choices, he does not have to look specifically at this apartment if he feels that it is not worth the trouble, as he is free in the end to do not pay for the product

Personally, I don't really understand the judgment that we can make in relation to the participants knowing that we are paying a subscription to see people living in apartments with cameras, so in the end we are far from being even saints :angel:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, moos54 said:

Basically if I follow your reasoning, it's a profitable situation for everyone
Voyeurs have what they expect from their investment, the same goes for VHTV, Jules and everyone involved.

What is good about this system is that the voyeur is free of his choices, he does not have to look specifically at this apartment if he feels that it is not worth the trouble, as he is free in the end to do not pay for the product

Personally, I don't really understand the judgment that we can make in relation to the participants knowing that we are paying a subscription to see people living in apartments with cameras, so in the end we are far from being even saints :angel:

Come on you know who that person is. It's the forums troll posting again with a new account. Why is he even allowed to do that when his last account was banned from posting? 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

Come on you know who that person is. It's the forums troll posting again with a new account. Why is he even allowed to do that when his last account was banned from posting? 

We are not a dictatorship either
As long as with a new account, the person is respectful of the rules, I do not see why it would be forbidden to return to the forum

Besides, that's exactly what happened several years ago with a member with whom you often had cordial exchanges, if we did what you want, you would never have been able to discuss with this person

Now even if I know who is speaking behind this account, I also have the right to give my opinion on the situation and to make a comment, perhaps this one will be able to raise awareness by saying that in the end, it There isn't really a dead man and it's always nice to have things to see even if these are more or less scripted

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, moos54 said:

We are not a dictatorship either
As long as with a new account, the person is respectful of the rules, I do not see why it would be forbidden to return to the forum

Besides, that's exactly what happened several years ago with a member with whom you often had cordial exchanges, if we did what you want, you would never have been able to discuss with this person

Now even if I know who is speaking behind this account, I also have the right to give my opinion on the situation and to make a comment, perhaps this one will be able to raise awareness by saying that in the end, it There isn't really a dead man and it's always nice to have things to see even if these are more or less scripted

But that makes banning a person from posting useless when he just can come back with a new account. 

Let's see I am sure he will be trouble again soon. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know who lipstick is and I do not have any issues with his posts or anyone else’s posts for that matter. It’s a free world and unless the forum rules are broken the words like banned should never be used. 


 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...