super134 Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 43 minutes ago, Kenpaul said: Leaving moral relativism aside, including the participants, and we as the voyeurs, is it safe to look at the 4 couples relationship? Linda & Tibor: solid Kitty & Smith: solid Miru & Dantez : quirky but solid Martina & Alberto: ???? I know she supposedly tells him everything, but fucking a woman (opposed to another man) is still stepping our from your commitment to your partner. Maybe there should be an asterisk (*) next to M&A on the RLC listing. Yup Kitty& Smith are solid the couple who physically and emotionally abuse each other. I guess people will say anything to take a shot at Martina & Alberto. 1 1
ddhm Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 27 minutes ago, DidiHamann said: Their commitment to each other is theirs to decide. There's more to relationships than being serial monogamists. Excellent said 👏👏 1 1
Kenpaul Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 45 minutes ago, super134 said: Yup Kitty& Smith are solid the couple who physically and emotionally abuse each other. I guess people will say anything to take a shot at Martina & Alberto. I'm just talking about seeing others. Nothing more,nothing less.
neil_r549 Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 9 hours ago, moos54 said: I will solve your math problem because Nelly is not even 30 years old I was told by a translater that Martina is 24 and Alberto 29, so close enough, Don't know about The Nell, to me she looks mid 30's but that could be down to certain substances!!
JenniferMom Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 44 minutes ago, super134 said: Leaving moral relativism aside, including the participants, and we as the voyeurs, is it safe to look at the 4 couples relationship? Linda & Tibor: solid Kitty & Smith: solid Miru & Dantez : quirky but solid Martina & Alberto: ???? I know she supposedly tells him everything, but fucking a woman (opposed to another man) is still stepping our from your commitment to your partner. It appears you are evaluating based on whether a couple has cheated. But this doesn't account for "open relationships". How would you evaluate Carlos & Claire? Are they solid? Perhaps another way to distinguish is whether the couple is committed to each other or whether it is a sort of "friends with benefits" arrangement. I think this is the question about Martina & Alberto. And I would put Anthony & Lorraine perhaps in the same category and possibly Bogdan and Nelly. I am NOT saying these couples are not committed. We are speculating and exploring and sharing observations here.
Kenpaul Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 52 minutes ago, DidiHamann said: Their commitment to each other is theirs to decide. There's more to relationships than being serial monogamists. It is their's to decide. That's why I included moral relativism at the beginning. Is there an accepted definition of a serial monogamist? Not a recently made up one. Thanks!
neil_r549 Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 Just now, Kenpaul said: It is their's to decide. That's why I included moral relativism at the beginning. Is there an accepted definition of a serial monogamist? Not a recently made up one. Thanks! Donald Trump?
Kenpaul Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 7 minutes ago, JenniferMom said: It appears you are evaluating based on whether a couple has cheated. But this doesn't account for "open relationships". How would you evaluate Carlos & Claire? Are they solid? Perhaps another way to distinguish is whether the couple is committed to each other or whether it is a sort of "friends with benefits" arrangement. I think this is the question about Martina & Alberto. And I would put Anthony & Lorraine perhaps in the same category and possibly Bogdan and Nelly. I am NOT saying these couples are not committed. We are speculating and exploring and sharing observations here. Please, refer to my comment about moral relativism.
Kenpaul Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 4 minutes ago, neil_r549 said: Donald Trump? Yesterday's news. Plus, that's not a definition. Only your example.
neil_r549 Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 9 minutes ago, Kenpaul said: Yesterday's news. Plus, that's not a definition. Only your example. it was not supposed to be taken seriously!! touchy are we? 1
Kenpaul Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 16 minutes ago, neil_r549 said: it was not supposed to be taken seriously!! touchy are we? To quote Jay Leno, "Comedy is hard."
neil_r549 Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 7 minutes ago, Kenpaul said: To quote Jay Leno, "Comedy is hard." Indeed!!!
Recommended Posts