sr71gn Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 I think the site is going down --They can add 20 new places but they are all the same--They lost 80% of their attraction by letting the pool compound go down-A voyeur site must be spontaneous and it must have some drama like a soap opera--I have been paying quite awhile but this is my last month -I miss my Rose-my Silvia-my Tory ...the storyline and closeness between all the compound people ---also Amy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic351 Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Hey VH! Do the participants still have access to their old apartments? If so, doesn't that suck that they have the ability to party without the cams? What are we paying for if they go to an apartment without any cams? I am specifically talking about Alex going to the old apartment with Drew, Bree, Misty, and Dean and partying there. I am not definitively saying this is happening. However, the possibility was brought up.. So, if it is possible, I'd like to know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Latest news at Voyeur House TV New House: Lisa Lisa, a girl who stayed with James while Chole was out, now got her own apartment. Neighbour to Misty, both girls love inviting some new friends to their places and lure them into amazing nights and spending time together. Both girls even had a quarell already because of one boy they both liked. Damn, we're quite sure you will love watching Lisa at her new place. Don't forget to let us know what you think about it! Watch Lisa's House Eric & Layla are now back! This is the latest batch of your beloved participants getting back to VHTV from our summer camp and definately the stars of VHTV so many of you love. One day these two rocked our project from the bottom. Now they got separate apartment, similar to Tony & Margaret's one. Watch Eric & Layla apartment New Houses are coming this month already. In addition, this autumn will be a season of many changes rolled out to our website for you to enjoy. We hope you will find these things convenient as they will help you navigating website and learn where all the hot action occurs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kzsjzkdjs Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 The Teya & Stan apartment is now listed as coming soon so maybe with Maya & Boris into the apartment ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groomy Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 On 31.08.2017 at 2:38 PM, waldi said: One Question. I there any chance to differ prices for access to apartments? I mean, I don't watch Stacy, Xenia, Gary & Dora, they're useless, boring, waste of time bla bla bla. Everybody knows my point of view, I don't want to talk about it anymore. I know they're people who want to watch them 24/7 it's not my problem at all. The only thing which I don't understand is why we Have to pay for that? Generally I'd prefer to pay just for apartments I watch, something like pay per view, or tv platform where you can choose what you want. if I had known, that money from my subscription goes to the right people, I would be much happier. At the moment we've got situation when people click on apartments (accidentally or not I don't know) generating traffic, but basically they're not interested it at all. Anyway, after opening a particular apartment, money "goes" to the participants, correct? So why not to have on the screen just apartments you want to watch? Example: I Like to watch hard sex and swingers, so I choose Anna, Bree, Misty, Alex and his drunk friends, and maybe Terry and Dana in the future who knows. Can you get it? please answer this. I do not like the idea for two reasons. 1) Of course, the apartments where there is change of partners - like Anna, Misty or CasaHot, get a lot more interest. And that means money. The rest of the apartments will die with an individual subscription. They are simply unprofitable to contain. All this turned into online Legalporno or Woodman. Simply because as normal couples do not survive. 2) For the subscriber. I signed for example Misty and Anna. Misty went home for a couple of days. Anna is sick. No guests. So what? Such periods - when there is nothing in top-end apartments, are regular. Now I can look at others in such a period. It is possible to discover new favorites. Perhaps, it is just worthwhile to work more on apartments from VH. If some apartment is gaining a critical mass of displeasure - work with it. Even if the statistics allows them to extend for another month. However - if the subscription for 1-2 pairs will be more profitable, but not critical, then can try. But, it is important to find a balance of prices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldi Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 56 minutes ago, groomy said: I do not like the idea for two reasons. 1) Of course, the apartments where there is change of partners - like Anna, Misty or CasaHot, get a lot more interest. And that means money. The rest of the apartments will die with an individual subscription. They are simply unprofitable to contain. All this turned into online Legalporno or Woodman. Simply because as normal couples do not survive. 2) For the subscriber. I signed for example Misty and Anna. Misty went home for a couple of days. Anna is sick. No guests. So what? Such periods - when there is nothing in top-end apartments, are regular. Now I can look at others in such a period. It is possible to discover new favorites. Perhaps, it is just worthwhile to work more on apartments from VH. If some apartment is gaining a critical mass of displeasure - work with it. Even if the statistics allows them to extend for another month. However - if the subscription for 1-2 pairs will be more profitable, but not critical, then can try. But, it is important to find a balance of prices. So what do you suggest, pure socialism? doesn't matter how the participants perform, they have to get paid? nonsense. If some of apartment are bad ,then yes, they will not survive, because why to pay for something which has't got any value. On the other hand, if couples have so many fans, like some people here say, there's nothing to worry about, they can compete easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groomy Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 2 hours ago, waldi said: So what do you suggest, pure socialism? doesn't matter how the participants perform, they have to get paid? nonsense. If some of apartment are bad ,then yes, they will not survive, because why to pay for something which has't got any value. On the other hand, if couples have so many fans, like some people here say, there's nothing to worry about, they can compete easily. Now apartments receive money for viewing from paid cameras. If subscribers do not watch paid cameras in the apartment - it does not receive money. It seems to me that it is necessary to pay attention to the balance. I like the monthly subscription for everything. Even if it slightly rises in price. In general, the company grows (VH) - opening new apartments can only: - increasing the audience - raising the subscription fee It seems to me - VH just need to work with problem apartments quickly, which cause general discontent. Even if the statistics they have within the norm. If you make an individual subscription more profitable than the general. This will lead to - that some apartments will receive much more (since the subscriber 100% finances only one apartment). Other apartments will be closed. Even if today they get a good profit. Just people who want to pay them, not Anna or Brazilian - will not be enough. This will lead to a reduction in apartments (for normal couples will not survive). And serious problems with new ones (for it is necessary to attract subscribers - making more Brazilians, Anna, Misty). As a result, will either have 5-7 apartments - which will survive and will be similar to each other. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhdem Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 no please not like RLC "premium" apts and standard apts, i do not accept differences between apartments.. we are living in a "premium age" where everything is becoming premium.. i hate this word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldi Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 20 minutes ago, Rhdem said: no please not like RLC "premium" apts and standard apts, i do not accept differences between apartments.. we are living in a "premium age" where everything is becoming premium.. i hate this word I did't mean premium and standard apartments, what I'm talking about is PPV like system, as golfer had said before I prefer to pay 15$ for 3 apartments I want to watch, then 40$ or more in the future for 15 apartments which I don't watch at all. Clear enough? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhdem Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 1 minute ago, waldi said: I did't mean premium and standard apartments, what I'm talking about is PPV like system, as golfer had said before I prefer to pay 15$ for 3 apartments I want to watch, then 40$ or more in the future for 15 apartments which I don't watch at all. Clear enough? Clear like water! I misunderstood 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ze81 Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 Very slow activity Saturday in VH..dam..almost doesn't feel it's weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic351 Posted September 4, 2017 Share Posted September 4, 2017 Hey VH! What can you tell us about "Coming Soon". I note that he/she or a couple known as "Coming Soon" is offline. Can you tell us when they will be "online"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.e335e3b234713d678b8911e6eec69d7b.gif)
Recommended Posts