Jump to content

Maya & Stepan - General Chat Comments, Quotes & Thanks for Pictures & Videos (2016)


BBsq69

Recommended Posts

Spot on. And not only that, but it's those same people that want nothing more than 7 different versions of Masha and Sasha or the all girls apartment that make CC kinda boring.

What is annoying it's the same people who constantly whine and moan about RCL but still watch it. :doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spot on. And not only that, but it's those same people that want nothing more than 7 different versions of Masha and Sasha or the all girls apartment that make CC kinda boring.

What makes you think that you're right and everybody else is wrong or their opinions do not count in your eyes?  I venture to say that if you never see any of the tenants naked or having some sort of sexuality going on, you wouldn't be here at all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all due respect Mr. FTS, you have got to admit that what goes on in most of these apartments isn't "Real Life" in the first place.  If nothing else RLC needs to screen their participants better and bring in new people that aren't shy or have a low sex drive.  The need people that are high sexed and that appreciate the people that are spending their hard earned money to be entertained by them, not tenants that don't want to do anything and are looking for a place to bunk!!  I'm not saying they have to have sex every damn day, but it's ridiculous the amount of sex that's currently not happening in several apartments!

I conflicted on this but only in a selfish way. What you say dfCcap is absolutely right but if there was more sex and nudity than there is now I don't know if could cope. However there's no question that there is vast imbalance going on at the moment with almost nothing going on in Dasha's apartment to Masha/Sasha at its height before they had guests. Now the girls' apartment seems to be the place to go although some of it does look rather pre-planned. 

People who appear on RLC really have to be delivering what the viewers want and that means nudity and sex, not all the time but enough. The sofa bed concept is interesting as I would like to know why if it is entirely the choice of the couples so many of them so often choose to sleep on them. I'm thinking of Nelly, Suzan, Maya and even Zoya if the guest isn't there. Masha and Sasha probably think they contribute enough but usually move to the sofa bed early in the morning. Of course we don't want all couples to be the same but maybe we could have less extremes.

Maybe it isn't that easy to find couples who fit in so that is why they might be loathed to get rid of any. Remember Lera and whoever it was! That apartment has had a lot of problems and I think it's partly the layout. Similarly Irma and Anna are great now but Sara and White didn't quite make it after a decent start. Ilona seems to be on her own separate mission. Of course we don't know her visa situation but you can pretty sure if her position was under threat she would start delivering like she did in her early days. For now she just does enough with Irma but it feels like their apartment is run under a different remit. BTW I have no idea why they brought Layla in.

Finally to the couple I watch most, Leora and Paul. While they fall well short of the quota of sex one would expect of a couple their age, they do look as though they might want more sex if only they could synch up their moods and played a few less emotional games. I'm not sure Leora sleeps on the sofa for any other reason that she feels comfortable there and nearly always has some hours in bed as well. Of course Leora compensates for the lack of sex with copious nudity and her own special entertainment.

I'm only rambling on because nothing apart from some wedding thing at Nina/Kira appears to be happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spot on. And not only that, but it's those same people that want nothing more than 7 different versions of Masha and Sasha or the all girls apartment that make CC kinda boring.

There ist no reason to keep people who hide or seperate sex from the cams, no matter how interesting they are. ... I like Ma&St, because there are really nice people. But when their attitude towards the project has changed, it should have an effect that is not only one-sided. ... I think the apartment is related to conditions. If they do not accept them any more, they sould just leave.

Just imagine all the couples would have no sex. ... Sound real and interressting? .. I do not think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There ist no reason to keep people who hide or seperate sex from the cams, no matter how interesting they are. ... I like Ma&St, because there are really nice people. But when their attitude towards the project has changed, it should have an effect that is not only one-sided. ... I think the apartment is related to conditions. If they do not accept them any more, they sould just leave.

There is a very clear difference between couples that move into the apartments and then hide from cameras when they have sex (ie Dasha/Demid) and couples like Mario and Carla or Masha and Sasha that fuck multiple times a day. I agree that TENANTS (because this obviously does not apply to people that are visiting) that aren't comfortable in front of the cameras or those that hide shouldn't be there, but I'm also not going to try to dictate exactly how much sex or nudity a couple has to show either. All couples are different and everybody has different levels of sex drives. Some couples have sex once or twice a day. Some have sex once or twice a week. I don't care about frequency. In the instance of Maya/Stepan, they probably have the least amount of sex out of all the RLC couples but I still like them, way more than any other couple here. I don't really care if the sad trolls of CC that just troll every board complaining about RLC every other post while simultaneously being thirsty for every single picture that is posted will never understand that. That last sentence was not referring to you Mr. Box. I was just throwing that out there...

And to comment on this sentiment by BBsq: "People who appear on RLC really have to be delivering what the viewers want and that means nudity and sex.." Who exactly dictates what every viewer wants? I had to make this point in another thread but I'm not going to pretend that I don't enjoy seeing the girl naked or watching her getting fucked, HOWEVER, I can promise you that sex and nudity is not what I want to see the most. I don't even look at Sasha/Masha cam and they have more sex (and better sex) than every other couple on RLC. And if you remember Isabella/Marcelo, they also fucked a lot but she was bat shit fucking psycho and I refused to watch their cam. Out of every tenant that has been here, she was the only one I ever had a genuine disgust for. There's a reason why RLC won't just hire porn stars to live there. Because they know real voyeurs won't even give them the time of day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even look at Sasha/Masha cam and they have more sex (and better sex) than every other couple on RLC.

Maybe you miss something. Due to the guests, you could see that there are nice people and much more than just sex. They also had a few funny moments (e.g. a fight about the blanked between Sasha and one of the girl guests). Not the same league as N&B, but much more interressting than a lot of other apartments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to comment on this sentiment by BBsq: "People who appear on RLC really have to be delivering what the viewers want and that means nudity and sex.." Who exactly dictates what every viewer wants? I had to make this point in another thread but I'm not going to pretend that I don't enjoy seeing the girl naked or watching her getting fucked, HOWEVER, I can promise you that sex and nudity is not what I want to see the most. I don't even look at Sasha/Masha cam and they have more sex (and better sex) than every other couple on RLC.

Of course it is not what every wants but it is what the vast majority want to see at some stage, so if couples or girls are not delivering at all on these fronts you have to question why they are there. As I thin I mentioned I do watch a lot of Nelly because she entertains and not just with nudity. i enjoy seeing her happy face and in company when she's always finding something to laugh about but on the other hand if there was not the other part of exhibitionism I would not have watched her in the first place. There has always been more to Masha then just the fucking and that has been brought out to some extent by the guests but she has a sense of fun and when she talks to Nelly via Skype (presumably) believe it or not but it is Masha who is the more animated and loquacious of the pair, which shows her potential. Sasha appears a bit lazy but is generally attentive to Masha helping her with whatever she wants to do as well as coping with her enormous appetites.

The BB in my name stands for Big Brother and it's not just because I'm an eldest child but because I was a big fan of those shows. I used to be on forums for hours about them and BBUK had precious little nudity so it was all about discussing relationships and scheming within the house so I get where you are coming from but I stand by what I say and the primary reason for RLC is to watch adults behaving like adults and for some couples the lack of or hidden nature of the sex is really going against why they are allowed the apartments in the first place. It did always bug me about Big Brother that nearly all of the female contestants showered in their bikinis because that is the opposite to natural behaviour ... especially as once out of the house so many of them went straight into the lads' magazines in which they seemed very keen to show off their assets, but then that's when many of them were using the show to launch careers. I suppose the question is whether behaviour knowing there are cameras there can ever be natural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, sometimes I get bored by specific couples, whether they flaunt their tits or not. My solution is extremely simple: I just don't click on those apartments. Problem solved.

Yes. That work well if there are enough alternative apartments. ... When there are to many non-interesting and non-functional apartments in the list, the solution would be to stay away entirely.

The summary for me look like the following list:  L&P, Ma&St, D&D, N&K, Z&L, C&M, A&D, C&S, S&H, N&B, Ma&Sa, K&L and I&I&A&L

Green: Interressting apartments; Red: Disliked apartments; Strikeout: Not working apartments (hide; vecation, ...)

So, There are 4/13 (N&K, Ma&Sa, N&B and I&I&A&L) apartments that are working and still interresting to me. That is why I am disappointed. ... Just have a look to the guest of K&L. They seams to be interesting people, sympatic, good looking and are a real couple. That is what RLC should look for. Not these broken relationships with introverted people that had added so many in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are 4/13 apartments that are working and still interresting to me.

And this pretty sums up why I don't feel like the value is worth it. Not because of the arbitrary superficial reasons like couples don't have sex enough, but simply because I do not feel it smart to pay $30/month to see one or two apartments that interest me, and $45/month to see only three. If there was an option to where you can only pay for the apartments you want to watch, that would be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...