Jump to content

Real Life Cam


Thestarider

Real Life Cam Demise  

113 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Real Life Cam Going Downhill and losing market share ?



Recommended Posts

Just now, jabbath1987 said:

What exactly do you mean?

I think he means when they contact RLC Support they are Mute most times and won't respond back when issues are reported. If they do respond all they send is something Copied & Pasted from a Text File.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted yes and my reasoning is the same with Thes and Amy even though I never watched VH for more than a couple of days.  The high prices RLC charges is ridiculous in the first place and not to mention them trying to capitalize the the replay function which I never did and never would pay for.  Their content doesn't market enough need to purchase such a service.  Myself personally, I have only watched a few days of VH but I can see where they are putting the squeeze on RLC and I can see where RLC is having a tough time dealing with it.  RLC's thinking is that if they bring in these so called model type girls that...that will sustain them in the market share.  First off, these so called models that RLC uses are full of botox and fake breast which is none of what I wanted to see.  Give me natural over that fake stuff all day long!!  I've seen every girl that has been brought in to RLC since I quit throwing my money away and there might be 2% of those that have any chance of modeling.

RLC obviously doesn't care about there customer base and that should be apparent by their total disregard in association with emails to support.  I personally wrote them at least 10 emails wanting to rejoin (stupid on my part) and never once did I hear back from them.  If that doesn't tell people something about the type of people that are running RLC, nothing will.

The whole BS with the Masha/Sasha/Dasha thing is like a last ditch effort to hold on to the people they have.  The question you have to ask yourself is why?  The answer is because that is what their competition is doing.  I don't know about the rest of you, but Dasha does absolutely nothing for me!  I think she is way to skinny (sorry to those women on the forum that might be on the skinny side) and she looks like a devil incarnate to me.....sorry, just my feelings on the matter.

Now they have this Eva chick who is trying to fill the void which contains nothing happening in her apartment from what I have been reading!!  I know a lot of people are in to the stuff that M/S/D & E/S are dealing but I'm an old fashioned type of guy and don't and won't ever swing that way.  My son told me that a girl he used to have a crush on in high school is getting a divorce and she blamed it on her husband for a couple of nights of swinging to spice up their love life.  She wasn't into it at all and only did it for him and now it has ended their 16 year marriage just like that......only because she gave in to the idea and according to her, she didn't want to do it and never felt comfortable doing it.

Anyway, I've said more than enough but my answer was YES to the pole!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, itsme said:

Yes, of course they are. I haven't followed Reallifecam for more than a year. Their copyright bullshit, limited free cams, and boring couples are all a big turn off. 

I couldn't agree more!!  It's been 16 months for me and even though I still receive feedback and a few videos from time to time, I don't regret my decision for dropping their sorry asses!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a member of RLC quite a long time ago until I found VV back in the days which was already better for me. RLC must invest a shit ton of money in these what I see on screenshots really nice places but mostly put for me really boring tenants in it. Just imagine the share the could make when they put crazy swinger couples in the big Barca house instead of boring, fake looking, teasing girls? 

I simply do not understand their business model???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RLC is trying to be the Lexus of on-line cams with the customer service attitude of a 1st generation Hyundai. VH is like a backroom massage parlor. Its a revolving door of casual sex.  I did a write up on them recently in another forum on this site, so I'll summarize.

Now,...what RLC does well is they have apartments occupied by couples that are romantically involved. They have a service that shows the lives of couples who make love, not have sex (3 or 4x/daily). Realistically, can anyone reading this post have sex 4x/day, 7 days a week?  Of course not - your wiener will get numb by the end of day two and within a few days, you'll desensitize yourself to what having sex is all about.

Anyway, RLC couples stick around for awhile (RLC closets are usually filled with clothes).  Unlike VH, which seems to have a revolving door. It seems VH is like a pimp that has subordinates that recruit kids to have sex on-line (with free room and board). RLC caters to a mature voyeur market. Unfortunately for them, a mature market is tighter with the wallet then the people VH goes after. RLC is what you watch if you're a romantic.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

VH is all about banging. Few couples are romantically involved. In fact, I would classify many of them as social outcasts (or grunge-like in their behavior). The way many are tatted up and their general behavior is conducive to "living in the moment" (casual sex, 3-somes, lots of drinking, un-kept apartments, etc). Have you seen a VH closet? You'll notice there is little clothes in most of the closets (as these kids don't have much to their name and/or live as vagabonds). They'll wear condoms to avoid pregnancy - not necessarily to avoid disease. 

VH caters more to the US market then RLC.  If you notice, all the 'kids' stay up until dawn and bang (or party) between 4A-7A local time (which is 8P-11P US east coast time). To have 90% of your apartments stay up until dawn (local time) to bang,...that is a VH directive and VH wants the US dollars.

Getting back to the poll, RLC is slipping because they are not adjusting to what the market wants (or where the money is).  The market wants what VH is showing. Just fucking - no romance. To a certain degree, the people on VH reflect the people they want to attract in the US. The 13 - 25 yr old impressionable and 'live for the moment' males that only know about banging. Kids in high schools who get head, get laid, treat sex as an activity/sport/dare/contest among friends.  VH knows it, caters to those people, and wants their money.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Howard said:

RLC is trying to be the Lexus of on-line cams with the customer service attitude of a 1st generation Hyundai. VH is like a backroom massage parlor. Its a revolving door of casual sex.  I did a write up on them recently in another forum on this site, so I'll summarize.

Now,...what RLC does well is they have apartments occupied by couples that are romantically involved. They have a service that shows the lives of couples who make love, not have sex (3 or 4x/daily). Realistically, can anyone reading this post have sex 4x/day, 7 days a week?  Of course not - your wiener will get numb by the end of day two and within a few days, you'll desensitize yourself to what having sex is all about.

Anyway, RLC couples stick around for awhile (RLC closets are usually filled with clothes).  Unlike VH, which seems to have a revolving door. It seems VH is like a pimp that has subordinates that recruit kids to have sex on-line (with free room and board). RLC caters to a mature voyeur market. Unfortunately for them, a mature market is tighter with the wallet then the people VH goes after. RLC is what you watch if you're a romantic.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

VH is all about banging. Few couples are romantically involved. In fact, I would classify many of them as social outcasts (or grunge-like in their behavior). The way many are tatted up and their general behavior is conducive to "living in the moment" (casual sex, 3-somes, lots of drinking, un-kept apartments, etc). Have you seen a VH closet? You'll notice there is little clothes in most of the closets (as these kids don't have much to their name and/or live as vagabonds). They'll wear condoms to avoid pregnancy - not necessarily to avoid disease. 

VH caters more to the US market then RLC.  If you notice, all the 'kids' stay up until dawn and bang (or party) between 4A-7A local time (which is 8P-11P US east coast time). To have 90% of your apartments stay up until dawn (local time) to bang,...that is a VH directive and VH wants the US dollars.

Getting back to the poll, RLC is slipping because they are not adjusting to what the market wants (or where the money is).  The market wants what VH is showing. Just fucking - no romance. To a certain degree, the people on VH reflect the people they want to attract in the US. The 13 - 25 yr old impressionable and 'live for the moment' males that only know about banging. Kids in high schools who get head, get laid, treat sex as an activity/sport/dare/contest among friends.  VH knows it, caters to those people, and wants their money.

 

You are wrong. Most viewers of VH are from Europe (Mainly Italy, Germany, France, Netherlands) I think Europeans are more open minded than mostly prudish Americans. Interesting is too that about 1/4 of VHs audience are female...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moi je n'aime pas VH parce que je n'y crois pas. Ça ressemble à du porno et y'en a déjà plein le web. Il ne se passe pas toujours grand chose sur RLC mais il semble y avoir des vrais couples. C'est ça qui m'excite. La rareté est aussi excitante. Je ne regarde plus Leora par exemple, n'ai jamais regardé Chloé. J'aimais beaucoup Adriana et Daniel à chaque fois qu'il se passait quelque chose, ça paraissait exceptionnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...