Melissa & Sergio (2019) Part #6

[Robwin]

7 minutes ago, Weeboabby said:

No this is a joke, why did the chicken cross the road twice?

Don't look at me I don't speak chicken.🤣

Got plenty of fucking cackle though 😁👍

[budda]

If I don't like seeing a tenant in a red t-shirt, I can say it 100 times.
If I don't like a tenants who spend hours on the computer (remember Sid?), I can say it 100 times.
Obviously I can't say, "That's stupid because he spends hours on the computer."
But if I'm not offensive, I can make any criticism: Neither more nor less than all those I've read since I am a member of CC.
However, if I had known that my "criticism" would have raised so much dust, I would have been silent.
Good evening to everybody (you too jjkopite).

[Robwin]

Just now, budda said:

If I don't like seeing a tenant in a red t-shirt, I can say it 100 times.
If I don't like a tenants who spend hours on the computer (remember Sid?), I can say it 100 times.
Obviously I can't say, "That's stupid because he spends hours on the computer."
But if I'm not offensive, I can make any criticism: Neither more nor less than all those I've read since I am a member of CC.
However, if I had known that my "criticism" would have raised so much dust, I would have been silent.
Good evening to everybody (you too jjkopite).

You carry on Budda feel free pal 👍

[Robwin]

5 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

 Well, I try to be concise anyways. 

😁 most often fail but who cares 🤣😂

[ivan beketov]

Нашли место где попиздеть сучки

[budda]

Giving an handjob while watching TV.  What a great passion!

[letsdothis]

8 hours ago, Amy3 said:

Well, I can go back and quote all of the posts making fun of him for pointing out her phone problem. Shall I do that? 

Yes, you could do that, but that wouldn't be quite the point. Melissa has
the right to do whatever the hell she wants to do with her life because it's
just that, her life. Subs and other viewers also have a right; the right to
watch what she and others decide to do. And that's it, period.

You've said it yourself: A sub buys you a view through the cams. It doesn't
give us the right to direct the lives of the tenants. We have no right to coax
badger, cajole, intimidate, manipulate, suggest, encourage, persuade, prod,
insinuate, needle, verbally attack, convince, induce, incite, influence, urge,
advise or in any other way, direct the lives of the tenants.

And it doesn't matter what behavior you use. Whether you come right out
and say, "Don't do that, do this instead," or you gently insinuate you would
prefer to see them do something different. Directing is directing.

8 hours ago, Amy3 said:

Then you are more then welcome to post comments in favor of that point of view. By all means tell us how you love watching her on her phone. But don't stop there, feel free to go into other apt threads and post comments there wishing they would stare that their phone more. It's all personal preference. Surely it's ok to be that way and be tolerated by other members here. 

I don't think he was speaking literally. It was an opposing opinion made to
illustrate what other viewers might like to see. He did say "hypothetically."

But, he makes a good point. Why should a tenant change their behavior
to suit the desires of one person, when they may already be doing what
100 other viewers prefer?

That's one reason why we don't have the right to direct the lives of the
tenants. If they start doing or not doing what that one person wants,
they may displease 100 others. Then where would their "views" be?
To quote a rather well-known Star Trek character,  "The needs of the
few do not outweigh the needs of the many." Or, something like that.

And I agree, we all have the right to express our opinions, within the rules
of the forum. And we can even repeat the same opinion ad infinitum, ad
nauseam. But, why on Earth would you want to do that?

Why would you choose to annoy and aggravate and irritate, offend, pester,
etc., and provoke the ire of your fellow viewers in this community? Why
would you want to generally get on other peoples' nerves? That's more
like the behavior exhibited by trolls.

 

[jabbath1987]

30 minutes ago, budda said:

Giving an handjob while watching TV.  What a great passion!

 0

Aren't you happy she isn't using her phone? 🤨

[budda]

1 hour ago, jabbath1987 said:

Aren't you happy she isn't using her phone? 🤨

Of course !

[Robwin]

1 hour ago, letsdothis said:

 It doesn't give us the right to direct the lives of the tenants. We have no right to coax, badger, cajole, intimidate, manipulate, suggest, encourage, persuade, prod, insinuate, needle, verbally attack, convince, induce, incite, influence, urge, advise or in any other way, direct the lives of the tenants.

Don't we all do that in one form or the other if we were honest, solely by our comments?

We are all quite outspoken about cam positions and lighting etc solely to satisfy our viewing so why pick on one member for his views. We are quick enough to moan about bad behaviour or non action as we see it. So to complain about Budda is being rather hypocritical don't you think. JMO. 

[SOMHO2000]

2 hours ago, jabbath1987 said:

Aren't you happy she isn't using her phone? 🤨

we need her to use her pussy .. LOL

[budda]

2 hours ago, letsdothis said:

Yes, you could do that, but that wouldn't be quite the point. Melissa has
the right to do whatever the hell she wants to do with her life because it's
just that, her life. Subs and other viewers also have a right; the right to
watch what she and others decide to do. And that's it, period.

You've said it yourself: A sub buys you a view through the cams. It doesn't
give us the right to direct the lives of the tenants. We have no right to coax
badger, cajole, intimidate, manipulate, suggest, encourage, persuade, prod,
insinuate, needle, verbally attack, convince, induce, incite, influence, urge,
advise or in any other way, direct the lives of the tenants.

And it doesn't matter what behavior you use. Whether you come right out
and say, "Don't do that, do this instead," or you gently insinuate you would
prefer to see them do something different. Directing is directing.

I don't think he was speaking literally. It was an opposing opinion made to
illustrate what other viewers might like to see. He did say "hypothetically."

But, he makes a good point. Why should a tenant change their behavior
to suit the desires of one person, when they may already be doing what
100 other viewers prefer?

That's one reason why we don't have the right to direct the lives of the
tenants. If they start doing or not doing what that one person wants,
they may displease 100 others. Then where would their "views" be?
To quote a rather well-known Star Trek character,  "The needs of the
few do not outweigh the needs of the many." Or, something like that.

And I agree, we all have the right to express our opinions, within the rules
of the forum. And we can even repeat the same opinion ad infinitum, ad
nauseam. But, why on Earth would you want to do that?

Why would you choose to annoy and aggravate and irritate, offend, pester,
etc., and provoke the ire of your fellow viewers in this community? Why
would you want to generally get on other peoples' nerves? That's more
like the behavior exhibited by trolls.

 

Does it mean "direct the lives of the tenants" to say that you are sorry to see a beautiful woman like Melissa spend hours and hours on the phone?

In every case - if you forgot - people have not subscribed to this site to see beautiful women who spend their days cleaning the house or ironing their clothes or washing the dishes. Or am I wrong ?