Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For me I quite liked Eric and Layla in the apartment they had at the beginning of the year and wasn't really impressed with the compound and how it's set up, but after the other day I don't care if they close the place now as I just skip them.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 7/19/2017 at 4:57 PM, groomy said:

Give the owner.

Rent for that house is not renewed. He is the most expensive of the three.

Expand  

Thanks for information. But when there will move in sb. else who is not in the project the whole idea of the compound will be ruined.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 7/19/2017 at 4:57 PM, groomy said:

Give the owner.

Rent for that house is not renewed. He is the most expensive of the three.

Expand  

so if the owner moves in someone not connected to the project the outdoor nudity will likely end. is that true?

  • Upvote 2
Posted
  On 7/19/2017 at 5:08 PM, golfer06 said:

so if the owner moves in someone not connected to the project the outdoor nudity will likely end. is that true?

Expand  

Yes thats what I wonder too:

It just does not make sense to me giving up realm1 because of the rent. If the curator moves in normal people the whole idea of the compound is dead. If he leaves it empty he wont get any money for it. So why should he do this? @groomy any information on this?

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 7/19/2017 at 5:08 PM, golfer06 said:

so if the owner moves in someone not connected to the project the outdoor nudity will likely end. is that true?

Expand  

I dont know.

There's a separate exit from that house - not adjacent to the pool. However, windows watching to the pool.

Here wrote (on the forum) - tired of nudity.

I'm not sure - that the owner will be able to quickly find new tenants. But if they find it. I think nudism will stop.

  On 7/19/2017 at 5:11 PM, jabbath1987 said:

Yes thats what I wonder too:

It just does not make sense to me giving up realm1 because of the rent. If the curator moves in normal people the whole idea of the compound is dead. If he leaves it empty he wont get any money for it. So why should he do this? @groomy any information on this?

Expand  

Question of money. They will work at loss with that house. It really costs a lot. On conversations - a little less than two other houses together.

  • Upvote 3
Posted
  On 7/19/2017 at 5:18 PM, groomy said:

I dont know.

There's a separate exit from that house - not adjacent to the pool. However, windows watching to the pool.

Here wrote - tired of nudity.

I'm not sure - that the owner will be able to quickly find new tenants. But if they find it. I think nudism will stop.

Question of money. They will work at loss with that house. It really costs a lot. On conversations - a little less than two other houses together.

Expand  

thanks as allways grroomy. please keep us up to date on what you can.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 7/19/2017 at 5:18 PM, groomy said:

I dont know.

There's a separate exit from that house - not adjacent to the pool. However, windows watching to the pool.

Here wrote - tired of nudity.

I'm not sure - that the owner will be able to quickly find new tenants. But if they find it. I think nudism will stop.

Question of money. They will work at loss with that house. It really costs a lot. On conversations - a little less than two other houses together.

Expand  

Again not good news. But thanks

Posted

The compound was a good idea, just executed poorly with this current cast of tenants. They were better off getting new people to live here rather the forcing the existing couples to live together.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...