Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Maturin

Members
  • Posts

    1,434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    1,360 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by Maturin

  1. They are probably bored which leads to depression I would imagine. If they are bored then they can only blame themselves, they don't do anything yet they have a free place to live and are getting a monthly salary - they could do so much more with their lives compared to regular people like us who have to go to work to pay rent/mortgage.
  2. This couple doesn't work, has no hobbies, doesn't have sex, doesn't even masturbate (except when she is pretending to start so she can get viewers), only leave the apartment to buy food and spend all day in bed with some TV in the living room sometimes in the evening. Absolute losers and a testament to all that is wrong with RLC. Fucking pathetic, what are they expecting us to pay for exactly? About the only thing that was interesting that they did in the begining was whatever drug it was they took. Those sessions used to be quite funny. Julia and Eric if you are reading this, start doing those drugs again and give your pathetic lives a little bit of purpose!!
  3. Great stuff from Kitty on the sofa, that-s the best place Kitty!!
  4. I just copied and pasted the text I sent to your competitor. It-s worth you checking out the Misty apartment in this context because the audio is terrible. Anyways, hop my suggestion might help. Regards.
  5. Just my 2 cents anyway that maybe came out a bit more aggressively than I intended but I've been sitting on it for a while. All I'd like is some apartments with people that like to have a lot of sex, go around naked and have interesting parties whenever the mood takes them. We know these types of people exist and can do their own thing without a whip being cracked or a schedule being drawn up for them. What I'm concerned with is the planned nature that we're seeing in everything, there's no spontaneity anymore and that has to be coming from people being "managed," in order to hit targets that put extra money in the pockets of the people running the tenants.
  6. So it's fine for you because some people in certain apartments are doing thing you like? It's still sex trafficking or pimping, call it what you want. We've all been watching these types of sites for long enough to know that some individuals/couples are a good fit for this sort of thing and naturally have a lot of sex and nudity and get good ratings - good on them for doing that and I would be watching them more than the SXLGDS - however... This whole concept of a manger intervening is pretty sick. Intervene to do what? Make them fuck more? Have more parties? Plan an evening of spin the bottle, so that the manager can get more money from the work of the tenants? If that's they way things are going (it obviously is) then they need to take the "voyeur" out of their name.
  7. It's not the sex/reallife debate for me, it's people being pressured into doing things by other people - "managers," that don't bring anything extra to the project except put stress on human beings with the ultimate censure of being able to evict them if they do not meet their targets. This is pretty much the definition of sex trafficking - compelling people to perform in certain ways or a penalty will be served.
  8. Nail on the head. This is a bullshit way to operate. Is everyone seriously OK with the fact that Misty needs to find regular sexual partners to fuck her live on cam otherwise she will not reach her targets and be evicted? What about the couples who are worried that they are not getting regular ratings so will end up with no place to live? This isn't "watching real people in real homes in the real time," - this is fucked up.
  9. @voyeur-villa Hey, I'll copy and paste something that I just posted over on VV, not sure if you've considered it but if not then this could help you guys save some bandwidth too: "You could probably save a lot of bandwidth by limiting which cams send audio. For an ordinary size room with 3 cameras in, you'll only ever need 1 camera transmitting audio, which saves, obviously 2 audio streams. The larger the room with more cameras then add the streams from the best cam positions but you'll never need to transmit from all of them. It will improve customer experience too. For example: Misty's apartment. The audio from the cam above the TV is awful because of the TV. There is no need to tell her to have the tv off or keep the TV volume low. Just cut out the audio stream from that cam and synch the video with the audio stream from the camera above the sofa. If you do this strategically in all apartments you're gonna see your bandwidth issues drop considerably. It's just a theory, that should be easy to do if you get the right person to look at it."
  10. I don't know if you've thought about this @Voyeur House TV but I just have and thought I'd share. You could probably save a lot of bandwidth by limiting which cams send audio. For an ordinary size room with 3 cameras in, you'll only ever need 1 camera transmitting audio, which saves, obviously 2 audio streams. The larger the room with more cameras then add the streams from the best cam positions but you'll never need to transmit from all of them. It will improve customer experience too. For example: Misty's apartment. The audio from the cam above the TV is awful because of the TV. There is no need to tell her to have the tv off or keep the TV volume low. Just cut out the audio stream from that cam and synch the video with the audio stream from the camera above the sofa. If you do this strategically in all apartments you're gonna see your bandwidth issues drop considerably. It's just a theory, that should be easy to do if you get the right person to look at it.
  11. Maturin

    Volga

    Fair enough, at least you've got a philosophy behind it.
  12. Maturin

    Volga

    Can you not get more apartments or are you stuck with the five? I'm not sure why couples have to share all the time, Julia and Steve are clearly better on their own.
  13. I'm calling the NSA and reporting you as Bin Laden 2
  14. Yep, and Mussolini fulfilled his promise of getting the trains to run on time and Adolf Hitler delivered on his campaign goal of Lebensraum. Both were, and were loved, by fascists. No one is asking anyone to be tribal and support only BLM or only American Fascists. It's not one or the other. There's decent people and there's fascists. Trump is an enabler of fascism. Those fucktards in Charlottesville, waving Nazi flags and doing Roman salutes, are fascist. The president of the USA has enabled them. As a European that is old enough to have witnessed many decades of disasterous American foreign policy, there's a large part of my mind that tells me that the only decent thing that America has ever done for the world was to get involved in Europe's fascist dictator problem and sort it out for us. You sent your young men over to fight and die to end tyranny, to defeat the rascist Ayran ideology, you freed the Jews in the death camps, you bolstered central Europe against the USSR. Your grandparents generation did that for the American values of freedom and liberty. To ensure that fascism could not take root in the world. And now look... ...the actual President of the United States of America has enabled Nazism and white supremacy to enjoy the highest profile they ever have on American soil. Is the debt clock, with it's ridicous almost imaginary number more important than the ideal that your country gave the lives of it's most able to uphold? What is happening to you America and why can't you see that there are decent people and then there are fascists and it is the rsponsibility of all decent people to defeat fascism, even when one of them is the president.
  15. I think she realised long ago that she only has to start pretending to play with herself and she will keep people viewing. For that, I'd argue that this is the worst apartment across all the voyeur sites. Nothing ever happens, and even when sex with Eric does happen then it's obvious to see why it is an infrequent thing - he is literally the worst "lover" I have ever seen! Paul, for example, is an order of magnitude better than that grabbing clutching gimp! She cynically manipulates the viewer, with no intention of ever following through and he is not only clueless he is also given to bouts of aggression and controlling her by fear. Worst apartment ever.
  16. Maturin

    Volga

    It's nice that the other tenants are trying to include them, you've got decent people in your apartments, but also I like that the Asian couple aren't so social and I don't understand why people are always calling for fake big parties and parlour games and other things on your competitor sites. There's a big, long planned party going on at VH now, ultimately nothing will happen and the 100s of people that are tuning in there will be disappointed - again. These two in Volga are naked all the time and have fun with each other without needing other people, that's good enough for me :) P.S. what are their names?
  17. Maturin

    Volga

    By the way, I really like this couple. A few times they've made me laugh out loud. The last time was a few days ago when she was chasing him around the living room with actual kitchen knives. He was trying to protect himself with the sofa cushions whilst she stood above him making stabby slicey movements. It went on for long enough that he was getting nervous which only made her pretend to be more psycho. Was pretty funny. I think this couple deserves their own apartment where they have the space to really be themselves, what do you think @VoyeurVillaNews?
  18. Maturin

    Volga

    Of course nothing happened. I watched for literally the time it took to close the window (I'll add that I only closed the window because they had a niece or someone there = nothing to see, boring family time). I saw the young girl and perhaps one of their mothers, an old lady anyway. Pretty stupid thing to let happen on an adult site but as far as I could tell there's nothing remotely like the time on VH with the kid in the shower. Chill out people. I'm sure VV will not let that happen again, it was a mistake but no harm done. The VH incident was unforgivable compared to this.
  19. I think there's one person coming through from this conversation that is displaying mental issues and I'm not thinking its Misty.
  20. The US had a very short monopoly on nuclear weapons - Russia tested its first bomb in '49, and the Korean war started a year after that. It was, as we all know, a proxy war between the US and USSR so the threat to use nuclear weapons could not have been used by the US. It isn't a virtue of the US that they didn't threaten to use them, it was simply sound policy to not invite a retaliatory Russian nuke. Like @van the man said, what action can be taken? Trump talking about using nukes is ridiclous but no one is surprised by such an immature response from the US President anymore. I'm hoping that the CIA is keeping tabs on the little butterball's movements and is ready to take him and all his generals out, quickly and relatively painlessly. Maybe that is all we can hope for and that NK's replacement leadership will have more sense. I can't see China having too much of an issue with a quick surgical strike. But... There's too many interested big guys, Russia, China and the US could easily find themselves in WW3 if the US President fucks this up - that President is Donald Fucking Trump - God help us!
  21. Definitely! Someone needs to take his phone away!
  22. So, the leaders of all four players, US, NK, China and Russia have mental problems. I don't think anyone would disagree with that. What I find weird is how anyone could think that the US could possibly win a war by invading NK. The US can't and doesn't win wars. It hasn't since WW2. After looking at the pathetic mess of Vietnam and Iraq, Afghanistan, no one in their right mind could contemplate that America could successfully invade NK - a country that has been on a war footing since it was set up after the mess of the Korean war. If people are still fighting against you, then no matter what GW proclaimed about Iraq, you haven't won. What could the US possibly do? Shock and awe? Yeah that worked brilliant in Iraq didn't it? Bomb them back to the stone age? Those fuckers are barely out of the pre-industrial age! What's that going to achieve? NK has the biggest concentration of artillery on the entire planet and it's all aimed at Seoul. Within minutes of Trump's fire and fury bullshit being enacted, NK would easily reduce the capital of South Korea to rubble - all of it gone, in minutes. This is the reason why no one has ever tried to fuck with them.
  23. I never knew they could be rented! Hmm, that's a cool little business idea that I might work on! Also @Voyeur House TV there is a toy called the Womanizer, look it up it's completely unique and your tenants will love it. We've got one and my lady loves it. If you got them one of those they'd become addicted! https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5623e75d61921
×
×
  • Create New...