Jump to content

Olivia & Liam


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, groomy said:

Well - it's bad for everyone. Managers and VH - do not have a stable profit. Participants have a lot of stress. They get the wrong hope. Seeing as the statistics falls - they do more, hoping to raise statistics. But it does not work. And game over.

I do not support opening deliberately flop apartments or the settlement non competitive participants. Better not to open anything - focus on finding good candidates. Than to open such.

Really good apartments from Alex and Lina - Ella&Isaac, Otto&Lola and maybe Clara&Stas (they passed time test and found their chips).

Guess they lost their contact at russia to find that type of pro tenants

I really think they are fooling tenants telling wonderful things about the project and then they "find" what is real... It's too much situations in 2 months to be a coincidence

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think AlexLina Zoi/Tim are very hard managers to work with. I think they demand a lot from their underlings. I hope that anyone considering working with them read the writing on these walls first and reconsider their options.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jabbath1987 said:

I do not think the place itself is the problem...

of course not. Just wanted to express my impatient caused by constant failures in this fucking place

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said:

I feel bad for the tenants. I do not feel bad for VH. Anybody with common sense could have predicted this would happen by opening this many apartments and pitting them against each other for views. Oh well.

And I bet VH will open a new apartment next week.

for VH they leave or not it's the same..  with X subscribers they earn the same amount of money (having 25 or 30 houses)... so if opening a new house brings one more subscription they will earn more... if the subscriptions don't increase at same rate then the number of houses it's not a problem for them but for tenants and managers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

I think AlexLina Zoi/Tim are very hard managers to work with. I think they demand a lot from their underlings. I hope that anyone considering working with them read the writing on these walls first and reconsider their options.  

For would-be participants is enough to watch some videos in archive to fully understand what they need to do, to survive.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Sparkles said:

Jab photos here have the more or less the same visible size on forum then mine or robwin or spielo (on top)... they aren't so bigger like the ones from damperlikamyon

I did now a test saving in normal screen and full screen and you see the visible size here it's the same (first isn't on full screen.. selected only visible area... second is total full screen and third full screen with bars cutted)

Hey Sparkles. Thanks for running this test. I just ran the same test and
my results were a bit different. I did this on a 17.3 inch, laptop screen,
with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. I don't have a bigger screen.

The 1st picture is in standard screen mode and its dimensions are
1045 x 592 (pixels).
The 2nd picture was capped in full-screen mode and its dimensions
are 1920 x 1080.
The third picture is one posted by @damperlikamyon and its
dimensions are also 1920 x 1080.

1250536021_2018-06-0313_50_33-VoyeurHouseTV.thumb.jpg.55edd3fce2eb14d045439e02037107af.jpg

452010886_2018-06-0313_50_56-Greenshot.thumb.jpg.8d748887e9968973c56dcca03c8f2ef1.jpg

34156757_1979768375685918_3195066527007113216_o.thumb.jpg.0d9acd94f3039f474f9dc01f5c6d525b.jpg

I also noticed a couple things about your test photos. First, they are
all much bigger than most of what you've posted in the past. Did you
get a bigger screen? If you did, congratulations. Second, I noticed
that all three pictures have different dimensions.

The 1st pic (normal screen) is 1665 x 938. I would expect this one to
be smaller.
The 2nd pic is 2559 x 1053. That's much bigger, at least on one side,
than mine or damperlikamyon's pics, which would seem to indicate
that you got a bigger screen.
The 3rd pic is 1921 x 1053

I forgot to say, Jabba's pics are typically much larger than mine or
damperlikamyon's. The last one of his I downloaded was 2451 x 1379.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, letsdothis said:

Hey Sparkles. Thanks for running this test. I just ran the same test and
my results were a bit different. I did this on a 17.3 inch, laptop screen,
with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. I don't have a bigger screen.

The 1st picture is in standard screen mode and its dimensions are
1045 x 592 (pixels).
The 2nd picture was capped in full-screen mode and its dimensions
are 1920 x 1080.
The third picture is one posted by @damperlikamyon and its
dimensions are also 1920 x 1080.

1250536021_2018-06-0313_50_33-VoyeurHouseTV.thumb.jpg.55edd3fce2eb14d045439e02037107af.jpg

452010886_2018-06-0313_50_56-Greenshot.thumb.jpg.8d748887e9968973c56dcca03c8f2ef1.jpg

34156757_1979768375685918_3195066527007113216_o.thumb.jpg.0d9acd94f3039f474f9dc01f5c6d525b.jpg

I also noticed a couple things about your test photos. First, they are
all much bigger than most of what you've posted in the past. Did you
get a bigger screen? If you did, congratulations. Second, I noticed
that all three pictures have different dimensions.

The 1st pic (normal screen) is 1665 x 938. I would expect this one to
be smaller.
The 2nd pic is 2559 x 1053. That's much bigger, at least on one side,
than mine or damperlikamyon's pics, which would seem to indicate
that you got a bigger screen.
The 3rd pic is 1921 x 1053

Nop.. same monitor and even used the same method (win10 tool for cutting) to be more accurate (now sometimes i use also bandicam).. 

I wasn't talking (and guess robwin wasn't also) about the pixel size of the images.. but about the difference here on size visibility on forum

If you see your and mine photos they have different sizes in pixels but all look the same in forum (unless you click them and they open in a new frame). But pics of damper no, they look bigger here

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...