Sparkles Posted June 3, 2018 Author Share Posted June 3, 2018 17 minutes ago, groomy said: Well - it's bad for everyone. Managers and VH - do not have a stable profit. Participants have a lot of stress. They get the wrong hope. Seeing as the statistics falls - they do more, hoping to raise statistics. But it does not work. And game over. I do not support opening deliberately flop apartments or the settlement non competitive participants. Better not to open anything - focus on finding good candidates. Than to open such. Really good apartments from Alex and Lina - Ella&Isaac, Otto&Lola and maybe Clara&Stas (they passed time test and found their chips). Guess they lost their contact at russia to find that type of pro tenants I really think they are fooling tenants telling wonderful things about the project and then they "find" what is real... It's too much situations in 2 months to be a coincidence 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 1 minute ago, waldi said: this place should be shut down once forever I do not think the place itself is the problem... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 I think AlexLina Zoi/Tim are very hard managers to work with. I think they demand a lot from their underlings. I hope that anyone considering working with them read the writing on these walls first and reconsider their options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted June 3, 2018 Author Share Posted June 3, 2018 3 minutes ago, fasterboss said: the only house that I like alex and lina and Clair's house, Now (with Olivia&Liam closing) actually that one and kristin&steve are the only ones i saw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldi Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 Just now, jabbath1987 said: I do not think the place itself is the problem... of course not. Just wanted to express my impatient caused by constant failures in this fucking place 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 4 minutes ago, waldi said: of course not. Just wanted to express my impatient caused by constant failures in this fucking place I know that's why I said outfit it with revolving doors or a curtain 😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted June 3, 2018 Author Share Posted June 3, 2018 14 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said: I feel bad for the tenants. I do not feel bad for VH. Anybody with common sense could have predicted this would happen by opening this many apartments and pitting them against each other for views. Oh well. And I bet VH will open a new apartment next week. for VH they leave or not it's the same.. with X subscribers they earn the same amount of money (having 25 or 30 houses)... so if opening a new house brings one more subscription they will earn more... if the subscriptions don't increase at same rate then the number of houses it's not a problem for them but for tenants and managers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldi Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 9 minutes ago, Amy3 said: I think AlexLina Zoi/Tim are very hard managers to work with. I think they demand a lot from their underlings. I hope that anyone considering working with them read the writing on these walls first and reconsider their options. For would-be participants is enough to watch some videos in archive to fully understand what they need to do, to survive. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letsdothis Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 49 minutes ago, Sparkles said: Jab photos here have the more or less the same visible size on forum then mine or robwin or spielo (on top)... they aren't so bigger like the ones from damperlikamyon I did now a test saving in normal screen and full screen and you see the visible size here it's the same (first isn't on full screen.. selected only visible area... second is total full screen and third full screen with bars cutted) Hey Sparkles. Thanks for running this test. I just ran the same test and my results were a bit different. I did this on a 17.3 inch, laptop screen, with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. I don't have a bigger screen. The 1st picture is in standard screen mode and its dimensions are 1045 x 592 (pixels). The 2nd picture was capped in full-screen mode and its dimensions are 1920 x 1080. The third picture is one posted by @damperlikamyon and its dimensions are also 1920 x 1080. I also noticed a couple things about your test photos. First, they are all much bigger than most of what you've posted in the past. Did you get a bigger screen? If you did, congratulations. Second, I noticed that all three pictures have different dimensions. The 1st pic (normal screen) is 1665 x 938. I would expect this one to be smaller. The 2nd pic is 2559 x 1053. That's much bigger, at least on one side, than mine or damperlikamyon's pics, which would seem to indicate that you got a bigger screen. The 3rd pic is 1921 x 1053 I forgot to say, Jabba's pics are typically much larger than mine or damperlikamyon's. The last one of his I downloaded was 2451 x 1379. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted June 3, 2018 Author Share Posted June 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, letsdothis said: Hey Sparkles. Thanks for running this test. I just ran the same test and my results were a bit different. I did this on a 17.3 inch, laptop screen, with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. I don't have a bigger screen. The 1st picture is in standard screen mode and its dimensions are 1045 x 592 (pixels). The 2nd picture was capped in full-screen mode and its dimensions are 1920 x 1080. The third picture is one posted by @damperlikamyon and its dimensions are also 1920 x 1080. I also noticed a couple things about your test photos. First, they are all much bigger than most of what you've posted in the past. Did you get a bigger screen? If you did, congratulations. Second, I noticed that all three pictures have different dimensions. The 1st pic (normal screen) is 1665 x 938. I would expect this one to be smaller. The 2nd pic is 2559 x 1053. That's much bigger, at least on one side, than mine or damperlikamyon's pics, which would seem to indicate that you got a bigger screen. The 3rd pic is 1921 x 1053 Nop.. same monitor and even used the same method (win10 tool for cutting) to be more accurate (now sometimes i use also bandicam).. I wasn't talking (and guess robwin wasn't also) about the pixel size of the images.. but about the difference here on size visibility on forum If you see your and mine photos they have different sizes in pixels but all look the same in forum (unless you click them and they open in a new frame). But pics of damper no, they look bigger here 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted June 3, 2018 Author Share Posted June 3, 2018 4 hours ago, damperlikamyon said: 8 minutes ago, letsdothis said: See?? on my screen the above photos appear like that (1st damper 2nd yours) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spielo Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 Unfortunately switched off. Status OFFLINE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.