Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

Maybe she is not too. Faverline does not sound Russian to me too

Faverline is not her real name. Like Mrs Kitty is not Lisa's real name. The two are russians 😉

Posted
Just now, pahman said:

Faverline is not her real name. Like Mrs Kitty is not Lisa's real name. The two are russians 😉

I think Matilda and Martinas might be real names. Faverline maybe to sound more English and she has more success on CB...

Posted
1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said:

I think Matilda and Martinas might be real names. Faverline maybe to sound more English and she has more success on CB...

Yes, that is possible.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

No, they didn't. She just accommodated the rule. Someone will sleep there. 

would a cat be enough??😀

Posted
1 minute ago, jabbath1987 said:

I think Matilda and Martinas might be real names. Faverline maybe to sound more English and she has more success on CB...

Doesn't sound very english to me 🤣🤣

I'm guessing further east... 👍

Posted
1 minute ago, purplewrap said:

Doesn't sound very english to me 🤣🤣

I'm guessing further east... 👍

Okay I would pronounce like the "favor" and the "line" Sounds English to me...

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, waldi said:

would a cat be enough??😀

Seriously! Might as well. Who cares, if guests can wear masks. Guests have some kind of super status apparently. Since they aren't tenants they should be able to cover and move cams too, I suppose. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

I won't get into all that. As we know voyeurism is what VHTV says it is and each of us can define it our own way. I just want to know if VHTV really thinks that people wearing masks counts as voyeurism in their eyes. If so, what difference does it really make if a tenant lives in the apt or not. 

We have seen people wearing masks in VH. I assume VH has no problem with that. But in my opinion wearing a mask or not has nothing to do with voyeurism, although we, voyeurs, are not happy about that, it doesn't remove the fact that we are "spying on people engaged in intimate behaviours, such as undressing, sexual activity, or other actions usually considered to be of a private nature" which is the fundamental meaning of voyeurism.

Posted
Just now, Amy3 said:

Seriously! Might as well. Who cares, if guests can wear masks

plus, she keeps milk in the fridge 😀

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...