letsdothis

Congratulations, Fiona! Welcome to the forum. Do you know your due date?

The user named Moonlight89 also speaks Russian and translates for us when asked or when he can understand what they're saying.

Speaking of stirring, did you see what Deborah was doing with Ian's stirring stick? (I think that's them.)

With my complete loss of hearing, I could hear them talking, but I couldn't understand a word. Until I read what Sturm said about Nina speaking Engrish , I thought you spoke Russian and was translating for us or you had found a way to translate what they were saying as they said it, dynamically. (There must be a way to do that, with technology what it is.) My favorite part was the cat getting "stuck" on that little skinny ledge and not being able to turn around.

It's JMHO, but I think Beverley is quite a little cutie pie. She has a beautiful smile, a very nice body and while I usually go for a bit more than a handful, she has quite a nice pair of little titties, too. Not to mention the red hair. There's just something about a redhead.

She has most certainly been smiled upon. I hope she stays to house sit while B & H are gone.

Definitely one for the Funnies.

I saw both. What does that mean? 😊

You always did post large pics, but it looks like someone got a bigger monitor. Thanks for the supersized pics.!!! 👍👍

You mean like Pavlov's dogs? 😊

I like to see what I'm eating and I don't like getting hair in my mouth. 😊

Good one. Unfortunately, I don't think it works that way, but I like the way you think.

These were the final stats for yesterday's (4/28) reporting period. And, today the US will have more than 60,000 dead. So sad.

The average American reads at about a 7th-grade level.

Hairless cats are naturally drawn to heat, even warm water. Because they have no hair, or very short hair, they have to use other methods to stay warm.

Misquoting me and Trump this time. Does that make what you said above, fake news? He might kick you out of his fan club for that. I quoted him verbatim, directly from his speech. I watched him say it. He said the US has done more testing than all other nations combined. That's not even anywhere close to being true. As I said in my post about it then, just the next eight countries with the highest number of cases after the US had more than double the number of tests as the US (not including China because we don't have those numbers for China). That was then. IDK what it is now. Think about that. Out of 210 countries and territories around the world affected by this virus, just eight have done more than twice as much testing as the US. If you were to add in the number of tests from all the other countries, the difference would be astronomical. Testing in the other countries ranges from a few dozen to a few hundred to several hundred thousand to over a million for the UAE. There are also some countries with no numbers for testing.

I was going to say good job on getting one right, but you just had to get your little jab in there at the end. I may have read it wrong, but you have no leg to stand on and no room to tell anyone to get their facts straight. However, notwithstanding my mistake, the facts remain the same. He said weeks ago there would be an investigation into why the death rate at the nursing homes was so high. That's when I read the article, maybe even around the time he issued the advisory. IDK, it's been a while.

If you're going to attack someone, at least make sure your facts are correct. The abnormally high death rate in New York's nursing homes occurred weeks before he issued his advisory on March 25, not the 24th. The deaths occurred throughout the month of March, not since the advisory was issued yesterday. The whole paragraph is 4th-5th grade English. Very easy, but let me spell it out. Weeks ago, it was found that New York nursing homes had an abnormally high death rate. At that time, the Governor said there would be an investigation into that problem. Yesterday, 4/25, he issued an order, called an advisory (see below, note the date), stating exactly what you said it did. "No resident shall be denied re-admission or admission to the NH solely based on a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19." He didn't issue the order and then wonder why so many were dying in nursing homes, which is what you said. He wanted to know why so many were dying weeks ago, long before he issued the order.

How about posting a link to his post, so I know what you're talking about. It's very easy to do. Go to his post Click the share button at the top right of the post Press Ctrl+C to copy the link Open a new post Press Ctrl+V to paste the link Submit it

Here's the hypocrite, again. What's laughable is that you have the nerve to call anyone in this topic, biased. You, probably the most biased person in this topic, have the utter audacity to cry "bias" at anyone else. After all the many times your comments have been corrected, you would think it would be obvious who is not thinking for himself, nor, apparently, doing any research, either. Who should we defer to, you? You're certainly no expert, although you keep commenting as if you were. The experts got where they are because they are expert at what they do. This has been explained to you over and over and still you pretend not to understand. No one your age could possibly be that ignorant. And, about the 60,000 or less dead, in case you hadn't noticed, as of this very minute, 55,411 people have died from this virus in the US. Just in the last seven days, not including today (Sunday), there have been 14,240 deaths from COVID-19 in this country. Whatever his ability to think, it's one hell of a sight better than what you've exhibited. And you think you have??? 🤣

Also, how would you know they're facts? Just a few posts above this one, you stated you had not watched the press conference in question.

If you're going to attack someone, at least make sure your facts are correct. The abnormally high death rate in New York's nursing homes occurred weeks before he issued his advisory on March 25, not the 24th. The deaths occurred throughout the month of March, not since the advisory was issued yesterday.

And the hypocrite raises his head yet again. In the same tiny paragraph you have the colossal gall to accuse people of not being factual, then make a biased comment based on hearsay.

I wasn't making excuses for anything because nothing failed. I simply stated the facts of how models work. You, however, keep beating this dead horse because you desperately want to find something or someone to lay the blame on, anywhere other than at your master's feet where it belongs.

He could solve every problem if he would just keep his mouth shut.